Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

2012.04.27 17:17 Podonok Году 9 узаконить 2019 класс перепланировку в

Welcome to the Russian side of Reddit, comrades. This is biggest Russian subreddit. We are not affiliated with the original Pikabu website. We luckily managed to escape their censorship.
[link]


2015.06.22 15:26 VasilyLupin Либерта: свободное обсуждение политоты и новостей

Этот сабреддит создан в качестве площадки для обсуждения с гарантированной свободой. Сообщество превыше всего, модераторы – помощники сообщества. Обсуждаемые темы: политика, новости, Россия, Беларусь, Украина, власть, оппозиция.
[link]


2014.03.14 12:08 Bodhidharma Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

Все про Україну. Основне правило: дотримуватися суспільноприйнятних норм спілкування культурних та ввічливих людей. Мат не є заборонений, коли є потреба. Повідомлення, що складаються здебільшого з матів, видалятимуться. Можна на "ти" - ми ж друзі. Ми спілкуємось українською, але російська та англійська також є прийнятні. У нас жорстке дотримання порядку. Що нам не подобається - видалятимемо та заборонятимемо.
[link]


2020.10.28 09:04 InternetFreedomIn Году класс 9 2019 в перепланировку узаконить

Watch the Watchmen Series Part 5 : The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
https://preview.redd.it/3setfuntwsv51.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=06c69280097017fd21f4df8af7906c3d4b9dab93
tl;dr Over the last couple of weeks, we have taken a closer look at the various surveillance technology projects that the Government is slowly putting in place. Now, we talk about why we should all be extremely worried. While this may sound alarmist, the lack of laws which would protect our privacy and from surveillance is one of the biggest causes of alarms in India’s near future.
Why should you care about privacy? In our previous posts in the “Watch the Watchmen” series, we have highlighted various projects that the government is developing and deploying that would enable it to strengthen the internet security structure of the country. These projects include the NATGRID, the CMS, the CCTNS and the AFRS.
The aim of the Government behind the introduction of these projects is to ensure that a higher level of coordination can be achieved between the intelligence agencies at the Central level and the law enforcement agencies to ensure that terror threats are neutralised swiftly and criminals can be apprehended easily.
While these concerns do come across as valid, the cause for alarm surrounding these projects is much simpler. These projects are problematic simply because India does not have a data protection regime in place to ensure that the privacy of its citizens is not compromised or violated by excessive interference or surveillance by the state.
Here, it is also important to understand that the right to privacy is essential and has been reaffirmed as a fundamental right in the landmark decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017 10 SCC 1). The right to privacy is not only relevant to those who may want to hide wrongdoing as has been the narrative but is important in various contexts, for example, to ensure that one is not discriminated against on the basis of belonging to a particular religious or social group or due to one’s political ideology.
The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 was touted as the solution to all the personal data related problems currently existing in India. It calls for obtaining consent before accessing an individual's data, penalties for any violations of the law, setting up a Data Protection Authority (DPA), and that the personal data which is collected be stored in India. However, the Bill fails to safeguard Indian citizens against state sponsored surveillance.
The PDP Bill, 2019 provides broad exemptions to the government by stating that consent is not required to be obtained by the State which can exempt any government department by an order.
Clause 35 of the Bill empowers the Central Government to exempt by an order, ‘any agency’ of the government from all or any provisions of the data protection law if it is in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations, public order and to prevent incitement to the commission of an offence. The only safeguard is that the written order from the Central Government must specify the reasons for such exemptions, ignoring the requirements otherwise established in Indian and international law of meeting the test of being “necessary and proportionate”. These exemptions will not just apply to data gathered by such agencies, but also with any data that is shared with such agencies by other data fiduciaries. It puts the power in the hands of the Central Government and specifically makes it the judge and adjudicator of its own cause. Clause 36 of the Bill also creates specific exemptions in certain cases, to which no safeguards will apply. Clause 37 which is supposed to empower the Central Government to exempt the processing of data of foreigners by data processors is also vaguely worded. Most intelligence agencies of India suffer from a lack of institutional oversight and there are no laws clearly defining their powers or limitations to those powers. Further, there is the lack of any serious review of telephone tapping and other communications interception powers in the Bill. This will make personal data of citizens open to mass surveillance and make the protection meaningless.
The Bill was first introduced in the Lok Sabha by the Minister of Electronics and Information Technology, Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, on December 11, 2019. The Lok Sabha referred the Bill to the Joint Parliamentary Committee which invited comments/suggestions from stakeholders till February, 2020. (Read IFF’s comments here) While the report of the JPC is due in the upcoming winter session of the Parliament, the Bill is likely to be tabled in the next year's budget session.
The Schrems II Dilemma On July 16, 2020, the Court of European Union (‘CJEU’) passed a landmark judgement in Data Protection Commission v. Facebook Ireland, Maximillian Schrems (‘Schrems II Decision’). The Schrems II Decision produced shockwaves for the practice of commercial transnational data transfers of personal data originating from the European Union (‘EU’) and being transmitted to a non-EU country, such as India. Under the EU data protection regime, data transfers are conducted pursuant to the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’), in conjunction with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Charter’) and several other directive and regulations. Chapter V of the GDPR allows for transfers of data outside the EU through three different modes, provided that the receiving countries were determined to provide adequate privacy protections for the same. First, an adequacy decision may be passed by the Data Protection Commission as to the existence of adequate privacy protection within the domestic legal framework of the receiving country. Second, an agreement to provide adequate safeguards, accompanied with enforceable data subject rights and effective legal remedies for data subjects. These may take place between two public authorities, such as in the case of the EU-US Safe Harbour or Privacy Shield, or between the sending and receiving data processors, such as in the case of Standard Contract Clauses (‘SCCs’), or between affiliated companies within a single commercial enterprise, such as in the case of Binding Corporate Rules (‘BCRs’). Third, derogations, or exceptions, to the requirement of either one of the above may be availed in specific circumstances.
The CJEU, in the Schrems II Decision, concluded three crucial findings regarding the transnational transfer of personal data from European Union:
A. The CJEU Confirms Extra-Territorial Application of GDPR for EU-Citizens’ Data
First, it held that the GDPR would remain applicable to personal data that has been transferred out of the European Union by one economic operator, or body corporate, to another for any commercial purpose, regardless of whether such data may be processed by the governmental authorities of the latter for the purposes of public security, defence and State security.
B. SCCs to Hold Validity Only if Underlying Framework Provides GDPR-Esque Data Protection
Second, it affirmed the validity of SCCs, provided that the level of data protection must be of a standard which is “essentially equivalent” to that guaranteed under the GDPR, read with the Charter. To this effect, The CJEU mandated the use of “other clauses or additional safeguards” in circumstances where the SCC itself failed to secure adequate levels of protection. These may cover, for example, the issue of law enforcement and access of personal data by government agencies. Additionally, respective Data Protection Authorities were under the obligation to suspend or prohibit data transfer to any third country wherein the aforementioned privacy safeguards, and alternative methods to achieve the same, were absent.
C. EU-US Privacy Shield Invalidated for Lack of Safeguard Against Government-Sanctioned Surveillance
Third, it invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield on the grounds that:
  1. the United State surveillance regime, based on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 178 and Executive Order 12333 (1981), assumes primacy of national interest and law enforcement over the fundamental right to privacy by allowing the the sanctioning of surveillance with no apparent limitation, violating the principles of proportionality in so far as the same is not restricted by the requirement of necessity,
  2. the United States does not provide foreign data subjects with an actionable right against the Government for privacy breaches, under the Presidential Privacy Directive 28 (2014) and Executive Order 12333 (1981), and
  3. the United States legislative framework is inadequate in ensuring the independence of the judicial ombudsman, an authority established by the EU-US Privacy Shield and an undersecretary of state, and the requisite authority of the body to deliver binging judgments upon US intelligence services.
What this means for India? According to Article 45 of the GDPR, the relevant inquiry into an adequacy decision involves an assessment of the rules and regulations applicable to data controllers and processors within a country. This also includes an analysis of the accompanying safeguards limiting the governmental access to foreign personal data. Per the Schrems II Decision, a like analysis would now be required for the operation of other modes of data transfer, such as Privacy Shields, SCCs, or BCRs. The recognition of the fundamental right to privacy in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (‘Puttaswamy Decision’) inducted principles of proportionality from Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Yet, without an underlying statutory framework, these rights lack remedial mechanisms that may be triggered by their violation. However, while the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (‘PDPB’) remains to be passed, India exists in a state of limbo. Without a current standard of foreign personal data protection for all commercial operations, India does not qualify the criteria for an adequacy decision. Additionally, as has been highlighted throughout our “Watch the Watchmen” series, the citizens of India themselves do not have any strict protections from state surveillance which vitiates the question of protecting foreign data from surveillance as well. In such a situation, India stands to be outcast by being restricted to trade and offer services within the EU.
The Schrems II decision analysis included in this post has been done by former IFF intern Rohit Gupta.
Important documents
  1. Essential Features of a Rights Respecting Data Protection Law dated February 28, 2020 (link)
  2. Public Brief and Analysis of the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (link)
  3. IFF’s “Watch the Watchmen” series on Surveillance Technology Projects in India (link)
Even during these uncertain times, IFF continues in its operations and working towards protecting your privacy and digital rights. Support us through one time donations or becoming a member with us. Donate now! internetfreedom.in/donate
submitted by InternetFreedomIn to india [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:53 sfvd34tr5 Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

暖夫不放棄陪伴300多天 終喚醒腦傷昏迷愛妻
黃婦的丈夫不放棄希望,終於成功喚醒愛妻。(圖/台中醫院提供)
不放棄的愛,終於成功喚醒妻子!台中一名59歲的黃姓婦人去(2019)年因心律不整造成心臟功能停止,經緊急CPR搶救後,雖救回一命,但造成腦部缺氧損傷,眼見愛妻癱臥在病床,先生每天陪她做高壓氧、針灸、復健,皇天不負苦心人,如今妻子已能扶著站立、回應簡單的字句,感人的夫妻之情讓醫護人員也動容!
黃姓婦人的丈夫表示,妻子經歷癱瘓、昏迷臥床、插管治療、氣切、帶3管(導尿管、氣切管、鼻胃管),到接受高壓氧治療,現在可以扶著東西靠著自己的力量站立,很感謝台中醫院的醫療團隊幫忙。
台中醫院高美國黑金 美國黑金心得 美國黑金正品 美國黑金香港 美國黑金使用心得
美國黑金ptt 美國黑金成分 美國黑金無效 美國黑金效果 美國黑金副作用
https://twblackgold.com/
美國黑金官網 美國黑金哪裡買 美國黑金好嗎 美國黑金用法 美國黑金真偽
美國黑金可以每天吃嗎 美國黑金成分 正品美國黑金官網 美國黑金副作用
美國黑金吃法 美國黑金沒用 美國黑金哪裡買 美國黑金藥局有賣嗎 原裝進口美國黑金
Black Gold USA Black Gold Black Gold副作用 Black Gold效果 Black Gold評價
Black Gold草本藥丸 Black Gold哪裡買 Black Gold草本藥丸評價 Black Gold香港
Black Gold,美國黑金 Black Gold官網 Black Gold草本藥丸ptt Black Gold心得
Black Gold正品 Black Gold價錢
美國黑金效果是什麼 美國黑金有什麼效果 美國黑金效果好嗎 正品美國黑金效果
臺灣美國黑金效果 原裝美國黑金效果 美國黑金效果多久 美國黑金壯陽效果
美國黑金增大效果 男性吃美國黑金效果
美國黑金副作用大嗎 美國黑金有什麼副作用 美國黑金副作用是什麼 美國黑金副作用頭痛
正品美國黑金副作用 美國黑金副作用緩解 降低美國黑金副作用
美國黑金官網是正品嗎 美國黑金官網是哪個 美國黑金官網地址 美國黑金官網效果
正品美國黑金官網 美國黑金官網入口 臺灣美國黑金官網 美國黑金代理商
臺灣美國黑金代理 美國黑金官網購買
美國黑金高雄哪裡買 美國黑金臺北哪裡買 美國黑金桃園哪裡買 美國黑金屏東哪裡買
美國黑金臺中哪裡買 美國黑金臺南哪裡買 美國黑金臺灣哪裡買 美國黑金宜蘭哪裡買
美國黑金嘉義哪裡買 美國黑金臺東哪裡買 美國黑金花蓮哪裡買 美國黑金新竹哪裡買
美國黑金苗栗哪裡買
https://twblackgold.com/
壓氧中心黃敏旭主任說,改善腦損傷病人的運動和感覺功能需要較長的時間,透過腦傷跨團隊整合治療,包括復健治療、中醫調養針灸及高壓氧輔助治療,助患者重獲健康。黃姓女病患經過百次高壓氧後,現在恢復狀況良好,也持續復健。
submitted by sfvd34tr5 to u/sfvd34tr5 [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:48 Gwathnar_Shadowfire Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

Hey all,
I want to start a small Blood Angels army with the new Primaris Marines. I know I should wait till the new Combat Patrol boxes come out but I’m impatient and want/need something to pick at now.
This is what I’m looking at picking up: https://www.games-workshop.com/en-CA/Start-Collecting-Vanguard-Space-Marines-2019
I’m getting mixed reviews from some friends that play 40K with 2 saying they are good and one saying pass so I thought I’d see what the old sub Reddit thinks.
Thanks in advance for your help.
submitted by Gwathnar_Shadowfire to BloodAngels [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:47 yesterday29 Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

Hi guys,
so Ive been on 20mg prozac since March 2019. In August 2020 I started taking 10mg. Around September I tried to quit it but I was getting brain zaps, couldn’t focus and I was feeling weird. So I started taking 10mg again.
The problem is that now I don’t take it consistently. For example: I take it on day 1 and on day 2, then I have a couple of days without prozac, and then I take it again.
I started feeling lightheaded, sleepy, cannot focus properly, cannot get my shit together.
Are those symptoms typical? Or it’s not connected with my medication?
Thanks!
submitted by yesterday29 to prozac [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:46 msmmsquaremedia 9 году 2019 перепланировку узаконить класс в

United Kingdom International Education Research Report - M Square Media LATEST PATTERNS AND TRENDS IN UK HIGHER EDUCATION
The international diversity we see in UK institutions and the academic community, the experiences, teaching, and research they offer, are renowned the world over. The quality and reputation of the UK international education sector are, in no small part, down to the scale, scope and quality of UK universities’ global engagement. The UK is truly an international sector with global reach and influence.
Check it here: https://msquaremedia.com/research/1st-quarter-of-2019-published-may-2019-united-kingdom-international-education-research-report/
https://preview.redd.it/4luw99pctsv51.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=b5389b2a05db951fe80df6461159ddde98306ab9
submitted by msmmsquaremedia to u/msmmsquaremedia [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:33 JW-1998 Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

This link directs you to a glossary of C-PTSD terms. If you are new to this forum and or the disorder, I advise that you consult the list for the sake of clarity and understanding.
Have a good day.
https://cptsdfoundation.org/2019/09/09/glossary-of-terms-for-cptsd/
submitted by JW-1998 to CPTSD [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:33 JoshicusBoss98 Узаконить 9 класс году 2019 перепланировку в

I saw youngbull do this so I decided to do my own version. Basically it includes a lot of the same events as his model, except I extended it a few years earlier, and also in my model experiencing a couple events does not make you part of the generation, it just means that you have some influence/traits from that preceding or succeeding generation. I break it down at the end.
1992 - 1993 = 1992 Presidential Election
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 1: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 2: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 3: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 4: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 5: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
Grade 7: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
Grade 8: 1978-79 (Class of 1997)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1977-78 (Class of 1996)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1976-77 (Class of 1995)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1975-76 (Class of 1994)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1974-75 (Class of 1993)
1993 - 1994 = Attack on Nancy Kerrigan
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 1: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 2: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 3: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 4: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 5: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Grade 7: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
Grade 8: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1978-79 (Class of 1997)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1977-78 (Class of 1996)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1976-77 (Class of 1995)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1975-76 (Class of 1994)
1994 - 1995 = Oklahoma City Bombing
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 1: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 2: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 3: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 4: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 5: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 7: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Grade 8: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1978-79 (Class of 1997)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1977-78 (Class of 1996)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1976-77 (Class of 1995)
1995 - 1996 = Windows 95 released
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 1: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 2: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 3: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 4: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 5: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 7: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 8: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1978-79 (Class of 1997)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1977-78 (Class of 1996)
1996 - 1997 = 1996 Presidential election
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 1: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 2: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 3: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 4: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 5: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 7: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 8: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1978-79 (Class of 1997)
1997 - 1998 = Stock Market Crash
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 1: 1999-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 2: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 3: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 4: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 5: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 7: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 8: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1979-80 (Class of 1998)
1998 - 1999 = Columbine shooting
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 1: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 2: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 3: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 4: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 5: 1987-88 (Class of 2006
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 7: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 8: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1980-81 (Class of 1999)
1999 - 2000 = Y2K
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 1: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 2: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 3: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 4: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 5: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 7: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 8: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1981-82 (Class of 2000)
2000 - 2001 = 2000 Presidential Election
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 1: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 2: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 3: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 4: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 5: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 7: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 8: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1983-84 (Class of 2002
Grade 12/Seniors: 1982-83 (Class of 2001)
2001 - 2002 = 9/11
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 1: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 2: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 3: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 4: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 5: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 7: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 8: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1983-84 (Class of 2002)
2002 - 2003 = Start of the Iraq War
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 1: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 2: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 3: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 4: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 5: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 7: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 8: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1984-85 (Class of 2003)
2003 - 2004 = Launch of MySpace
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 1: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 2: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 3: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 4: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 5: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 7: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 8: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1985-86 (Class of 2004)
2004 - 2005 = 2004 presidential election
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Grade 1: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 2: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 3: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 4: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 5: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 7: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 8: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1986-87 (Class of 2005)
2005 - 2006 = Hurricane Katrina
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 1999-00 (Class of 2018)
Grade 1: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Grade 2: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 3: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 4: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 5: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 7: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 8: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1987-88 (Class of 2006)
2006 - 2007 = Virginia Tech shooting
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 2000-01 (Class of 2019)
Grade 1: 1999-00 (Class of 2018)
Grade 2: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Grade 3: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 4: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 5: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 7: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 8: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1988-89 (Class of 2007)
2007- 2008 = Great Recession
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 2001-02 (Class of 2020)
Grade 1: 2000-01 (Class of 2019)
Grade 2: 1999-00 (Class of 2018)
Grade 3: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Grade 4: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 5: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 7: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 8: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1989-90 (Class of 2008)
2008 - 2009 = 2008 election
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 2002-03 (Class of 2021)
Grade 1: 2001-02 (Class of 2020)
Grade 2: 2000-01 (Class of 2019)
Grade 3: 1999-00 (Class of 2018)
Grade 4: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Grade 5: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 7: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
Grade 8: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1990-91 (Class of 2009)
2009 - 2010 = H1N1 Pandemic
Elementary schoolers
Grade K: 2003-04 (Class of 2022)
Grade 1: 2002-03 (Class of 2021)
Grade 2: 2001-02 (Class of 2020)
Grade 3: 2000-01 (Class of 2019)
Grade 4: 1999-00 (Class of 2018)
Grade 5: 1998-99 (Class of 2017)
Middle schoolers
Grade 6: 1997-98 (Class of 2016)
Grade 7: 1996-97 (Class of 2015)
Grade 8: 1995-96 (Class of 2014)
High schoolers
Grade 9/Freshmen: 1994-95 (Class of 2013)
Grade 10/Sophomores: 1993-94 (Class of 2012)
Grade 11/Juniors: 1992-93 (Class of 2011)
Grade 12/Seniors: 1991-92 (Class of 2010)
1975 - experienced 1 event
1976 - experienced 2 events
1977 - experienced 3 events
1978 - experienced 4 events
1979 - experienced 5 events
1980 - experienced 6 events
1981 - experienced 7 events
1982 - experienced 8 events
1983 - experienced 9 events
1984 - experienced 10 events
1985 - experienced 11 events
1986 - experienced 12 events
1987 - experienced 13 events
1988 - experienced 13 events
1989 - experienced 13 events
1990 - experienced 13 events
1991 - experienced 13 events
1992 - experienced 13 events
1993 - experienced 12 events
1994 - experienced 11 events
1995 - experienced 10 events
1996 - experienced 9 events
1997 - experienced 8 events
1998 - experienced 7 events
1999 - experienced 6 events
2000 - experienced 5 events
2001 - experienced 4 events
2002 - experienced 3 events
2003 - experienced 2 events
2004 - experienced 1 event
Summary:
1975 - 1979: Experienced 5 or less events (Late X/X leaning Xennial)
1980 - 1984: Experienced 6 - 10 events (Early Y/Y leaning Xennial)
1985 - 1994: Experienced 11 - 13 events (Core Y)
1995 - 1999: Experienced 6 - 10 events (Late Y/Y leaning Zillennial)
2000 - 2004: Experienced 5 or less events (Early Z/Z leaning Zillennial)
submitted by JoshicusBoss98 to generationology [link] [comments]


2020.10.28 08:23 3aJlynuLLLa Узаконить перепланировку в 2019 году 9 класс

Суд признал бывшего главу Челябинска Евгения Тефтелева виновным в получении взяток (ч. 6 ст. 290 УК) на сумму более 2,5 млн рублей и приговорил к трем годам колонии и штрафу. Об этом РБК сообщили в пресс-службе Центрального районного суда. «Ему [Евгению Тефтелеву] назначено наказание в виде лишения свободы на три года в исполнительной колонии строгого режима. Ему назначен штраф — 37,5 млн руб с лишением права занимать должности на государственной службе и в органах местного самоуправления, связанные с осуществлением функций представителя власти, организационно-распорядительных и административно-хозяйственных полномочий сроком три года», — рассказали в пресс-службе. В суде добавили, что экс-глава города лишен медалей орденов «За заслуги перед Отечеством» первой и второй степени. По данным пресс-службы, сторона обвинения просила приговорить Тефтелева к 6,5 года лишения свободы, а также назначить штраф в размере 75 млн руб. Защита просила не приговаривать экс-главу города к реальному сроку, а ограничиться штрафом в «разумных пределах». Бывшего главу Челябинска задержали сотрудники ФСБ 11 декабря 2019 года в Магнитогорске. Несколько месяцев он провел в СИЗО. Тефтелев занял пост главы города в 2014 году. Спустя четыре года он покинул должность, уйдя в досрочную отставку после представления прокуратуры из-за проблем с вывозом мусора и требований прекратить уплотнительную застройку. Несколько месяцев он был вице-губернатором области, но новый глава Челябинской области Алексей Текслер уволил его с этого поста.
submitted by 3aJlynuLLLa to PikabuNews [link] [comments]